Legal experts say that that a mischief in the bud convincing innocent most abused laws, which are women and children repression Prevention Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act but not suffocate judge harrowing trial for not blame to undergo before they are acquitted of Their?s. Without mince his words, renowned lawyer Rafiqul Huq said daily Sun, the judges, the refusal applied financial loss, to persons inflicting judicial head were, unfairly were already tarnished their reputation.
Section 241 A and section said 265 D of the code of criminal procedure (CrPC), lawyer of Ruhul Quddus, that seems the judges and concerned should initiate to center the accused before the charge against him, if the case appears to be concocted or no reasonable basis.
?IT is the Court is bound to the accused innocent or guilty, ? appointed questions whether he wants, what he said.
He claimed that the child courts though the courts in accordance with section 411 of the CrPC to are required no punitive actions against the informer or plaintiff in fictional cases.
MD Attorney Robert INAM tipu noticed that ask a framed person, his innocence and the Court in violation of the plea of a tragic tradition has become.
?Despite the determination of the termination of the accused in wrong case, the Court is not even willing to consider discharge applications. It is rather a long process to inflict, pain and Misery?, he said.
Barrister Abul Kalam Azad, said 30-40 percent utilization of the pending cases can be reduced, if the subordinate courts charged with people in false cases and went against the plaintiff.
Finally incorrectly called ?Cases, which is not proved. The Court is to feel the falsehood of cases previously, ?, he said.
Sometimes, plaintiffs said complaints show innocent people as Prime Minister on the advice of the police accused contact, he. ?But the Court relieves not innocent people. Framed persons are tried only on the ground that they are the main culprits. The Court should not always leave on the FIR [first information] report by the police. ?
Advocate Manzill Murshid said, ?The standards of proof in criminal and civil cases are different. Charges against the accused in criminal proceedings should be proved 100 percent. If not noted the allegations about justified doubts are, the accused should be acquitted. Claims in civil proceedings are proved on the basis of the balance sheet probability. ?.
He said judge criminal and civil cases maybe try are often confused and mixing rules in the apply.
Trumped-up charges by women against men, women and children repression Prevention Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act filled he said that the Court relieves not up to the end of the procedure, causing untold suffering and misery Schlegelberger.
Source: daily-sun.com
Read More on prothom alo news
No comments:
Post a Comment